Post by hasset on Jul 10, 2009 17:36:48 GMT -6
www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=50819
Justice Ginsburg Says She Originally Thought Roe v. Wade Was Designed to Limit 'Populations That We Don’t Want to Have Too Many Of'
Friday, July 10, 2009
By Christopher Neefus
“Reproductive choice has to be straightened out,” Ginsburg said. “There will never be a woman of means without choice anymore."
I know it is difficult for women to get ahead in life if they have kids to support alone, but it is their choice. I know I am much older than the rest of you but I can say that when I was in High School in the 50s, there was only one girl in my class of 170 who got pregnant. She dropped out of school and married the baby's father. Back then, parents had to take care of their pregnant daughters or the baby's father did, not the tax payers. That is the way it should be. There would not be as many unwanted pregnancies if kids knew they had to have their parents pay or take care of them. It is called personal responsibility and parental control. When the government stepped in to do the parenting and to pay people for having babies out of wedlock, this country took a nose dive. It has taken a further nose dive when wanting to pay for abortions. The Democrats and some Republicans have stuck their noses in parents' business and made things worse.
There probably have been people in our government who wanted certain segments of our population reduced with the use of abortion. It is a dangerous thing to even think about it.
Read the article for yourself. There is too much to report here. Be sure to look at the people's comments at the end. This is what one of them said:
RightStuff (38 minutes ago)
Ginsberg's statement is indeed breathtaking. It is true that the killing of black babies is at a rate three times what it should be, given the population of the country. My last numbers were 38% of abortions were of black babies, when the blacks make up only about 12% of the population.
Justice Ginsburg Says She Originally Thought Roe v. Wade Was Designed to Limit 'Populations That We Don’t Want to Have Too Many Of'
Friday, July 10, 2009
By Christopher Neefus
“Reproductive choice has to be straightened out,” Ginsburg said. “There will never be a woman of means without choice anymore."
I know it is difficult for women to get ahead in life if they have kids to support alone, but it is their choice. I know I am much older than the rest of you but I can say that when I was in High School in the 50s, there was only one girl in my class of 170 who got pregnant. She dropped out of school and married the baby's father. Back then, parents had to take care of their pregnant daughters or the baby's father did, not the tax payers. That is the way it should be. There would not be as many unwanted pregnancies if kids knew they had to have their parents pay or take care of them. It is called personal responsibility and parental control. When the government stepped in to do the parenting and to pay people for having babies out of wedlock, this country took a nose dive. It has taken a further nose dive when wanting to pay for abortions. The Democrats and some Republicans have stuck their noses in parents' business and made things worse.
There probably have been people in our government who wanted certain segments of our population reduced with the use of abortion. It is a dangerous thing to even think about it.
Read the article for yourself. There is too much to report here. Be sure to look at the people's comments at the end. This is what one of them said:
RightStuff (38 minutes ago)
Ginsberg's statement is indeed breathtaking. It is true that the killing of black babies is at a rate three times what it should be, given the population of the country. My last numbers were 38% of abortions were of black babies, when the blacks make up only about 12% of the population.
